Aikido vs Veracode: Combining SAST and DAST for Complete AppSec

To build a truly resilient application, security testing cannot be one-dimensional. A comprehensive application security (AppSec) program requires a defense-in-depth strategy, and two of the most critical testing methodologies are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). SAST provides an “inside-out” view by analyzing source code, while DAST offers an “outside-in” perspective by testing the running application.

When used together, SAST and DAST provide a more complete picture of an application’s security posture. Choosing the right platform to deliver these capabilities is crucial. Veracode is a long-standing leader in the AppSec space, offering a powerful suite of enterprise-grade tools. Aikido Security represents a modern, developer-centric alternative that simplifies and consolidates security testing.

This comparison will explore how Veracode and Aikido Security approach the combination of SAST and DAST, helping you understand which platform best fits your organization’s needs for complete and efficient application security.

The Power of Combining SAST and DAST

Before diving into the platforms, it’s important to understand why combining SAST and DAST is so effective.

• SAST (Static Application Security Testing): Scans an application’s source code, byte code, or binaries without executing it. It’s excellent for finding vulnerabilities like SQL injection, buffer overflows, and insecure coding patterns early in the development lifecycle (the “shift-left” approach). For a deeper understanding of how SAST works and its impact, see the OWASP SAST Guide.
• DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing): Tests the application while it’s running by simulating external attacks. It’s effective at finding runtime and environment-related issues, such as server misconfigurations and authentication flaws, that SAST cannot see. Learn more about DAST methodologies from NIST’s Application Security Verification.

A vulnerability identified by both SAST and DAST is a highly confirmed threat that should be prioritized. By combining these methods, you get a holistic view, covering both implementation flaws in the code and runtime issues in the deployed environment.

The Contenders at a Glance

• Veracode: A comprehensive, enterprise-focused AppSec platform known for its robust and mature SAST and DAST solutions. It is designed for security teams and organizations with stringent compliance and policy requirements.
• Aikido Security: A developer-first security platform that integrates multiple security scanners, including SAST and DAST, into a single, easy-to-use interface. Its focus is on eliminating noise, simplifying workflows, and empowering developers.

Feature and Philosophy Breakdown

Want to explore best practices for integrating SAST and DAST in DevOps workflows? The following reputable resources provide practical guidance and actionable steps for teams aiming to enhance their application security posture:

• SAST and DAST in DevSecOps: Benefits and Best Practices (OWASP Foundation)
• How to Integrate Security Testing into DevOps Pipelines (National Institute of Standards and Technology – NIST)

1. Approach to Integration and Workflow

Veracode offers powerful, distinct SAST and DAST tools within its platform. The SAST solution can scan binaries, which is useful for protecting intellectual property, while its DAST scanner is highly configurable for testing web applications. However, these tools often operate as separate stages in the security process. A security team typically configures the scans, runs them at specific points in the CI/CD pipeline, and then triages the results before passing them to developers. This workflow, while thorough, can introduce delays and create a disconnect between security testing and the daily development process.

Aikido Security takes a unified and integrated approach. It bundles best-in-class open-source SAST and DAST engines into a single, seamless workflow. When you connect a repository, Aikido automatically discovers your application and sets up the appropriate scans. The key difference is that Aikido treats SAST and DAST findings as part of one continuous stream of security data. This allows the platform to correlate findings from both scanners, providing a more intelligent and contextual view of vulnerabilities without requiring developers to switch between different tools or reports. The entire process is designed to be automated and low-friction, fitting naturally into a fast-paced DevOps environment.

2. Developer Experience and Triage

This is where the philosophical divide is most apparent.

Veracode is built with the security professional as the primary user. Its dashboards and reports are comprehensive and detailed, providing a wealth of information for analysis. However, for a developer, this can be overwhelming. The volume of findings from both SAST and DAST scans can be significant, often requiring a security analyst to act as an intermediary, filtering out false positives and translating security jargon into actionable development tasks.

Aikido Security is fundamentally developer-first. The platform’s core mission is to eliminate noise and reduce developer friction. It automatically triages findings from all its scanners, including SAST and DAST, to surface only the most critical and reachable vulnerabilities. By analyzing the application’s code paths, Aikido can determine if a vulnerability is a real threat or a theoretical issue in an unused part of the code. For a developer, this means fewer alerts, higher confidence in the findings, and a clear, prioritized list of what needs to be fixed. This builds trust and encourages proactive engagement with security.

3. Scope and Completeness

While this comparison focuses on SAST and DAST, a complete AppSec program needs more.

Veracode offers a broad suite of services, including Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for open-source dependencies and manual penetration testing. These are often licensed as separate components of their broader platform, allowing organizations to build a comprehensive program.

Aikido Security provides this “all-in-one” coverage by default. Its single platform includes SAST, DAST, SCA, secret detection, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanning, and more. This consolidated approach simplifies procurement and management. More importantly, it allows for deeper, cross-functional insights. For example, Aikido can link a vulnerability found by DAST back to the specific line of code and the open-source dependency that introduced it, providing a complete chain of evidence that dramatically speeds up remediation. This holistic view is essential for effective vulnerability management.

Who is Each Tool For?

• Choose Veracode if: You are a large enterprise with a mature security program and a dedicated team of security analysts. You need granular control, extensive policy management, and detailed compliance reporting, and you have the resources to manage a powerful, multi-product security suite.
• Choose Aikido Security if: You are a modern, agile team that prioritizes developer productivity and efficiency. You want to empower your developers with a simple, automated, and unified platform that provides comprehensive SAST and DAST coverage without the noise and complexity. Your goal is to make security a seamless part of the development process, not a separate gate.

Conclusion

Both Veracode and Aikido Security provide the necessary tools to implement a robust AppSec program combining SAST and DAST. Veracode offers a powerful, traditional suite for security-led organizations, while Aikido presents a modern, integrated solution for developer-led environments. By simplifying the combination of SAST, DAST, and other security scans into a single, noise-free platform, Aikido enables teams to achieve comprehensive application security with greater speed and efficiency.

Share this post: on Twitter on Facebook